Latest Presidential Tracking Polls 2008

tab Home
tab Bookmark Us!
tab State Polls
tab National Polls
tab Battleground Polls
tab House/Senate Polls
tab Gubernatorial Polls

 

Presidential Candidates

tab Obama tab McCain
tab Nader tab Bob Barr
tab McKinney tab Baldwin

Battleground States

tab FL tab PA tab OH
tab NV tab MI tab NH
tab CO tab OR tab NJ
tab WA tab IA tab WI
tab MN tab SD tab VA
tab MO tab NM tab AK
tab CT tab GA tab NC
tab ND    

Pro-Obama States

tab CA tab DE tab HI
tab IL tab ME tab MD
tab MA tab NY tab RI
tab VT    

Pro-McCain States

tab AL tab AZ tab AR
tab ID tab IN tab KS
tab KY tab LA tab MS
tab MT tab NE tab OK
tab SC tab TN tab UT
tab WV tab WY tab TX

 

youtube

 

 

Democratic Exit Polls

tab Race tab Gender
tab Issues tab Income

Pollster Grades

tab ARG tab IADV
tab Mason tab RR
Free Daily Poll Summaries
Email:
rss feed

Ron Paul Polling 3-5% Higher but Ignored and Considered Not Statistically Important?

Published June 3, 2007, 1AM PST

Update: 6/5/07

I have asked some pollsters to help me out with regards to polling 18-29 year olds specifically to measure the support Ron Paul has in this demographic. Thus far, they have each expressed disinterest because they claim that demographic is too tough to poll.

There is a natural boost of about 3% that we feel Ron Paul will get and it is not being reported. This is a very bold statement that even I did not believe until after looking through all the data. In fact, the boost can become as high as 5% in just 2 months.

We predicted a drop to Rudy Giuliani that many of you surprised that we could make. He dropped 20% in 2 months. We predicted that the momentum in the Democratic race had shifted away from Barack Obama to Bill Richardson and we were called crazy because Obama had twice the support as Richardson. But the latest Iowa poll proved us correct again with Obama and Richardson in a statistical tie.

And we would be amazed if we were wrong with this prediction.

The Internet support Ron Paul is getting is being glossed over by many because it has not translated to a boost in the polls. But it does not tell the whole story. I think it is safe to assume that the majority of the Ron Paul supporters are young even though I do not have real statistical proof to back up that claim. I looked at the exit polls for the past 2 elections and noticed that about 15-20% of the voters are 18-29. That is about 1/5 of the voting public.

Ron Paul would undoubtedly fare much better among this small 20% of the public than the other 80%. Now the question to ask is whether this faction of our society is accurately being polled. We feel that for the most part they are fairly included in the polls. Of the pollster data that we have looked at, we have seen that group represented by an average of only about 3% less than would normally vote.

There is a couple of reasons for this small 3% difference that we feel to be because of the fact that a lot of individuals in the age group do not have landline telephones and because of the fact that the pollsters try to focus on those that are likely to vote. But for all the 18-20 year olds that have never had the choice to vote or not, how would the pollsters know who they are likely to vote for? The youth overwhelmingly support a liberal candidate and/or a third party candidate. Case in point is the 2004 election in which this age group voted for Ralph Nader 250% more frequently than the other age groups. For the Republican primaries and caucuses, that rogue candidate that appeals to the youth is Ron Paul and he is running as a Republican.

Another issue to note is the fact that many in this age group who are potential Ron Paul supporters are in college. How can they be polled if they are in college? Once they return home during the summers, we might see things shift a bit.

Pollsters get away with not correctly polling this very small faction. If the faction represents only about 3-5% of the public and their votes are distributed evenly across all the potential candidates then they have very little impact on the election. It is simple statistics and you cannot blame the pollsters for not wanting to spend the extra money and effort in profiling the youth. It is like the silent minority label that Asian Americans have had for ages. The Asian-Americans have been traditionally nullifying themselves by splitting their vote among Republicans and Democrats. Neither party takes the time nor the effort to pander to that minority group.

So in our prediction, we are going on the assumption that this time the 3-5% represents a stronger bloc of voters that will be overwhelmingly supporting Ron Paul if they are not already thanks to the good old Internet.

There is also a group of younger voters that may be profiled by the pollsters as not being likely to vote but would vote for Ron Paul. They may have been too disenfranchised by the political process and never felt that they had anyone to vote for until now.

Just imagine how many individuals rely on the Internet for information. Okay, the preference is still on television but the average voter will use the Internet at some point. If the Ron Paul supporters continue to support their candidate in a positive wholesome manner as they have, the average voter will have no choice but to see Ron Paul's message and thoughts.

This natural boost as we call it may never be seen nor reported until election day when the voters' real voices are heard. But if Ron Paul continues to languish in the polls, the youth that overwhelmingly supports him may not even bother to vote for him. And we may never see this natural boost that the polls should be reporting.

But this is just a theory because I have not seen any critical analysis done on the 18-29 age group that incorporates those without landlines, those that have never been eligible to vote before, and for those that have previously been too disenfranchised with our political process and never voted but would this time for a Ron Paul.

I am doubtful that any of the major pollsters will step up to the plate to analyze this group so I am in the process of contacting polling agencies to do a study on this for me. So keep your eyes peeled.

If you are a Ron Paul supporter, please join digg.com and digg our Ron Paul page... The more diggs it gets, the more people will learn about Ron Paul.
Our Ron Paul Page

Leave your comments for me below.

Leave Your Comments, No Registration

Predicted Electoral Math

tab Latest Polls Per State
tab Poll of Polls
tab Quinnipiac University
tab Rasmussen Reports Polls
tab Research 2000
tab Survey USA Polls
tab CNN
tab American Research Group
tab Insider Advantage
tab Zogby
tab Mason Dixon
tab Public Policy Polling
tab Strategic Vision

Odds of Winning

tab Obama -230, McCain +160

Senate Races 2008

AL: Sessions vs Figures
AK: Stevens vs Begich
CO: Schaffer vs Udall
IA: Reed vs Harkin
ID: Risch vs Larocco
KS: Roberts vs Slattery
KY: McConnell vs Lunsford
LA: Kennedy vs Landrieu
MA: Beatty vs Kerry
MI: Hoogendyk vs Levin
ME: Collins vs Allen
MN: Coleman vs Franken
MS: Cochran vs Fleming
MS: Wicker vs Musgrove
NC: Dole vs Hagan
NE: Johanns vs Kleeb
NH: Sununu vs Shaheen
NJ: Zimmer vs Lautenberg
NM: Pearce vs Udall
OK: Inhofe vs Rice
OR: Smith vs Merkley
SD: Dykstra vs Johnson
TX: Cornyn vs Noriega

VA: Gilmore vs Warner

 

Polls We Have Conducted...

tab CA: Bush, Congress, Arnold
tab CA: Issues
tab CA: Prop 98 & 99
tab CA: Impact of Gender & Boss
tab CA: General Election

Useful History

tab Democratic Exit Polls
tab 2004 Primary Polls

 

proloyProloy "Paul" Bhatta
M.S. Engineering; UCLA

david charles terrDavid Terr
Ph.D. Math; Berkeley
joseph hunterJoseph Hunter
High School Intern from Michigan

Website Inquiries: Leave a message at (310) 487-8657

>> Press Coverage <<

 

 

Chinese: 奥巴马, 麦凯恩.
City Demographics: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

One of the biggest perturbations of Random Digit Dialing polling (RDD) is the accidental calling of business phone numbers. So we track these numbers and report to you the prefixes within each area code most likely to be reserved for business use.

Business Listings By Area Code: 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 225, 228, 229, 239, 240, 248, 250, 251, 252, 253, 256, 260, 262, 267, 269, 270, 281, 283, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 309, 310, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323, 325, 330, 334, 336, 337, 347, 352, 353, 360, 361, 386, 401, 402, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 412, 413, 414, 415, 417, 419, 423, 425, 432, 434, 435, 440, 443, 469, 478, 479, 480, 484, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 507, 508, 509, 510, 512, 513, 515, 516, 517, 518, 520, 530, 540, 541, 559, 561, 562, 563, 570, 571, 573, 574, 580, 585, 586, 601, 602, 603, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 612, 614, 615, 616, 617, 619, 623, 626, 630, 631, 636, 641, 646, 650, 651, 660, 661, 662, 678, 682, 701, 702, 703, 704, 706, 707, 708, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 724, 727, 731, 732, 734, 740, 757, 760, 763, 765, 770, 773, 774, 775, 781, 785, 786, 787, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 808, 810, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 830, 831, 832, 843, 845, 847, 850, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 863, 864, 865, 866, 870, 877, 888, 901, 903, 904, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 925, 928, 931, 936, 937, 940, 941, 949, 951, 952, 954, 956, 970, 971, 972, 973, 978, 979, 980, 985, 989.

Coming Soon: 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics

© Copyright 2006-2008 USAElectionPolls.com, All Rights Reserved.