Latest Presidential Tracking Polls 2008

tab Home
tab Bookmark Us!
tab State Polls
tab National Polls
tab Battleground Polls
tab Senate Polls

 

Presidential Candidates

tab Obama tab McCain
tab Nader tab Bob Barr
tab McKinney tab Baldwin

Battleground States

tab FL tab PA tab OH
tab NV tab MI tab NH
tab CO tab OR tab NJ
tab WA tab IA tab WI
tab MN tab SD tab VA
tab MO tab NM tab AK
tab CT tab GA tab NC
tab ND    

 

 

 

Free Daily Poll Summaries
Email:
rss feed

Proof: Fox News Censors Ron Paul

9/5/07

We posted an article just a few hours ago about the upcoming Republican presidential debate and we pondered whether or not Duncan Hunter would get more time to speak because of his win at the Texas straw poll. And a user posted a response asking why Duncan Hunter should be given more time when Ron Paul has won four straw polls.

The straw polls that Ron Paul has won is not at the same level as the Texas GOP straw poll. If I was to take an informal straw poll of my neighbourhood and found that we overwhelmingly supported Ron Paul, would that be comparable... No. The Texas Straw Poll just happens to be considered official. But statistically and scientifically they are all trash anyways because straw polls are just polls of whoever is willing to join.

By the way, let us put in a plug for our sister site USAStrawPolls.com where we are tracking all of the straw polls results that we can find. By the way, Duncan Hunter has also won a straw poll in Arizona.

Anyways, we have seen overwhelming complaints by Ron Paul supporters upset at news coverage in which they feel their candidate has been "silenced" when he should not be. Is that a valid complaint? Should the absence of a reference to a candidate be a sign of unfairness?

Well we decided to look into this. So what we did was a raw Google search of how many times each of the Republican candidates have been mentioned on some of the popular news media. Click on the numbers to see the exact search string we used to determine the entries to the table.

Candidate USAToday LA Times Fox News ABC News CNN CBS News NYTimes
Mitt Romney 2,110 94 13,000 5,940 960 1,810 87
Rudy Giuliani 2,790 1,400 6,570 3,510 1,650 1,910 7,280
John McCain 4,590 96 4,060 6,840 3,540 3,550 15,500
Fred Thompson 423 63 1,860 1,120 530 1,520 357
Mike Huckabee 985 65 1,030 1,250 330 1,550 7,090
Ron Paul 723 72 248 1,600 273 216 21,700
Sam Brownback 1,200 80 670 1,380 584 493 1,270
Tom Tancredo 842 60 755 601 231 205

476

Duncan Hunter 852 84 502 624 299 71 535

We understand that it is absurd to think that every candidate should be mentioned in exactly the same frequency everyone else for a variety of reasons -- number of campaign stops the candidates make, how many press releases the candidates have sent out and how long they have been in public service.

But I think it would be a relatively fair comparison to bundle up the candidates into two pools; the top 3 (Giuliani, Romney, McCain) and bottom tier and compare the frequencies with which the bundles are referred to. The two bundles should at least be close, shouldn't they? We are excluding Fred Thompson from the "top candidates" bundle because he has not been an official candidate for long. In fact, he won't make his announcement for another couple of hours.

Candidate USAToday LA Times Fox News ABC News CNN CBS News NYTimes
Top Bundle 9,490 1,590 23,630 16,290 6,150 7,270 22,867
Bottom Bundle 5,025 424 5065 6,575 2,247 4,055 31,428
Ratio: T/B 1.89 3.75 4.67 2.48 2.74 1.79 0.73

As we can see from the above table, the "fairest" coverages are from NYTimes, CBS News, and USAToday. Even though LA Times had a high ratio, if you were to exclude Rudy Giuliani from the group; it is actually pretty fair. The biggest culprit of fairness is Fox News. They refer to the top 3 candidates almost 5 times more than they refer to any of the other candidates. Mitt Romney was referenced 13,000 times on the FoxNews.com domain while Ron Paul has only been referenced 248 times. So for every 52.4 articles on Mitt Romney, there will only be one article on Ron Paul. That is absurd. On no other news source is the disparity as large as it is on Fox News.

Tell us what you think of the findings in this article.. If you like it, please share it with your friends as it took us a long time to compile all of the data. And if you think this is a load of $!^@# because we were missing something, please let us know by email so we can redo parts of it if necessary.

Even though the compilation may have been boring for us, the results are quite astounding. And we will be committed to test out more hypotheses in the upcoming couple of weeks.

Leave Your Comments, No Registration

 

Predicted Electoral Math

tab Latest Polls Per State
tab Poll of Polls
tab Quinnipiac University
tab Rasmussen Reports Polls
tab Research 2000
tab Survey USA Polls
tab CNN
tab American Research Group
tab Insider Advantage
tab Zogby
tab Mason Dixon
tab Public Policy Polling
tab Strategic Vision

 

Chinese: 奥巴马, 麦凯恩.
City Demographics: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

© Copyright 2006-2008 USAElectionPolls.com, All Rights Reserved.